State Of Forces Agreement

April 12, 2021

1963: Agreement to implement the NATO Troop Status Agreement of 3 August 1959 1993, countries conclude a SOFA.104 The agreement was then renewed on 19 September 1994; April 28, 1995; November 29, December 1 and December 8, 1995. The countries reached an agreement in 1998 on the treatment of U.S. forces that visited the Philippines.105 This agreement was amended on April 11 and 12, 2006. The difference between this agreement and SOFA, originally concluded in 1993, is that this agreement applies to the visit of US forces that are not stationed in the Philippines. Countries have also reached an agreement on the treatment of staff from the Republic of the Philippines, which travels to the United States (agreement in equivalent).106 With each discussion on SOFA, it should be noted that there are currently at least 10 classified agreements. The agreements are classified for national security reasons. They are not covered in this report. 1954: Agreement on the deployment of the US armed forces to the Netherlands in 1995: agreement on the status of US military and civilian DOD personnel who may be in Albania as part of the Joint Military Search and Rescue Exercise (SAREX). 2004: Additional agreement on “agreements between North Atlantic Treaty member states and other states participating in the Peace Partnership on the Status of their Armed Forces” on the status of US forces in the Republic of Albania The political issue of soFS is complicated by the fact that many host countries have mixed feelings about foreign bases on their soil. , and SOFA`s renegotiation requests are often combined with calls for the total withdrawal of foreign troops. Issues of different national practices may arise – while the United States and host countries in general agree on what constitutes a crime, many American observers believe that the host country`s judicial systems offer much lower protection than the United States and that the host country`s courts may be under pressure from the public to be found guilty; In addition, U.S. service members who are invited to send shipments abroad should not be forced to waive their rights under the Rights Act. On the other hand, observers of the host country who do not have a local equivalent of the law of rights often feel that these are irrelevant excuses for special treatment and resemble the extraterritorial agreements demanded by Western countries during colonialism.

A host country where such sentiment is widespread, South Korea, itself has forces in Kyrgyzstan and has negotiated a SOFA that gives its members total immunity from prosecution by the Kyrgyz authorities for any crime, which goes far beyond the privileges that many South Koreans enter into their country`s couch with the United States. [11] U.S. Status Agreement

NewsArchives